SCREEN-L Archives

February 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Tue, 23 Feb 1993 13:31:41 EST
In-Reply-To:
Your message of Tue, 23 Feb 93 11:20:00 -0500. <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
The news media is "Liberal?" I assume that those qoutation marks are intended
to qualify that statement in some Orwellian fashion as in "Freedom" is slavery.
After all, this "liberal" news media with its highly emotional images was
responsible for whiping public support for Bush and the U.S. military
 intervention into the Gulf War to absurd highs. The labeling of the news media
 as
"liberal" is an old conservative tactic. It not only allows them to deny the
narrow range of opinion expressed in most news broadcasts, but also to dismiss
any and all criticisms of current policies, no matter how muted, as further
evidence of this phantom "liberalism." I saw a recent study that indicate that
more than half of the broadcast journalists in the United States regarded
themselves to be Republicans. But, then, the GOP always was a hotbed of
"liberalism."

ATOM RSS1 RSS2