SCREEN-L Archives

February 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Michael K. Kuentz" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 28 Feb 1993 17:50:32 EST
In-Reply-To:
Message of Sat, 27 Feb 1993 21:06:00 EST from <P1O@PSUVM>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines)
How about
   Journalists are more or less objective than advertising writers (?)
 
  And which clique of journalists are we looking at? Photo-journalist /
Documentarians? Or Trash / Hard Copy/ A Current Affair journalists? I
hope that we shall discuss the first above mentioned group and not the latter.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2