SCREEN-L Archives

April 1994


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Robert Withers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 8 Apr 1994 23:39:30 EDT
text/plain (27 lines)
This is a voice against making screen-l a usenet conference.  I originally
checked out film-l and cinema-l and found them big timewasters, with lots of
fannish chit-chat.  I think on those lists someone mentioned screen-l, and on
screen-l someone mentioned h-film, and I took the little bit of extra trouble
to subscribe.  I find the discussions here at a much higher level, with lots
of useful information and many thoughtful insights shared.  I think this would
possibly degenerate pretty quickly as a usenet conference.  The average user
checking out usenet would have no basis for understanding a different
character belonging to the cinema, film, screen lists, and I'm afraid they
would all homogenize.
Screen-l seems to have a fairly broadbased, international group of subscribers.
Has this developed simply by word of screen, and through those brave enough to
search the list of lists?
If screen-l were a usenet conference, I gather netters who don't have access
to usenet would still be able to access sceen-l via e-mail, as now?
Robert Withers
Film Department
Brooklyn College
Brooklyn, New York 11210     Bitnet:   [log in to unmask]
(718) 951-5664               Internet: [log in to unmask]