SCREEN-L Archives

February 1993

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 22 Feb 1993 20:32:24 -0500
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
I think that, when it comes to any portrayal of the oppressed by a
"renegade" member of the oppressing society, there is always the
question of who is exploiting whom.  The commentaries of the homeless
indicate that they were taking advantage of the publicity for all it was
worth, just as much as the filmmakers here taking advantage of the focus
upon their heroism of the moment.  I am sorry if that seems too cynical.
Also, while the filmmed oppressed may eventually return to anonymity, so
will the filmmakers.  It seems that the two must work together, be
champions of each other, in order to maintain public attention.
 
Carol Robinson
Gallaudet University

ATOM RSS1 RSS2