SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Gayle F. Wald" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 1995 20:26:35 CST
In-Reply-To:
Message of Wed, 29 Mar 1995 17:05:26 CST from <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
In response to William Brooks's message:
Yes, I did notice that people of color seemed to be absent (once again) from
the awards (did you check out the assembled celebs?--same thing there).  That's
why the canonization of Forest Gump seemed so insidiously significant.  I'm
referring to Gump as a film about the innocence of the White Man (i.e. Gump as
the unknowing participant in "making history"; Gump as the uncomprehending
bystander of "civil rights"; Gump as the desexualized savior of fallen women).
For me, then, the enshrinement of Gump goes hand in hand with the invisibility
you point out; it's even more creepy if you realize how Gump was introduced:
as a film about humanity, good old-fashioned values, the triumph of good over
evil and corruption.
 
Gayle Wald

ATOM RSS1 RSS2