SCREEN-L Archives

November 1997, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
HR Greenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Nov 1997 19:50:21 -0500
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
i can't recall whether I put this post here or in another venue.
 
Saw parallels between ALIEN II and STARSHIP TROOPERS in terms of a future
capable of producing laser  disintegrator   blaster  disrupter technology
   yet the confrontation is between troops with hi tech machine guns  and
 bug like aliens or downright bugs in ST   this enables close killing (or
being killed), human wave tactics and all the other tropes out of WWII films.
In ALIEN II it was clear Viet Nam was being recuperated, refought, rewon.
ST's situation is more problematic to interpret, given the lack of local wars
to be recuperated, particularly since the last time we went up against the
degraded repellant colonials -- in Desert Storm -- we stamped them into the
ground. Anyone think ST is a reprise of Desert Storm? If so, why so?
 
HR Greenberg md endit
 
----
To sign off SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2