> Paul Ryersbach wrote:
> >In my opinion the answer is clear in the director's cut: Deckard is a
> >replicant. (...) I do not think this was in the originally released
> >version and in my view was one of the factors that made the director's cut
> >a much more complex and interesting film.
 
I just want to clarify that I didn't write this. My position is that the
idea of Deckard's being a replicant is never adequately or consistently
developed in either version of the film.
 
        paul ryersbach
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]