> Paul Ryersbach wrote: > >In my opinion the answer is clear in the director's cut: Deckard is a > >replicant. (...) I do not think this was in the originally released > >version and in my view was one of the factors that made the director's cut > >a much more complex and interesting film. I just want to clarify that I didn't write this. My position is that the idea of Deckard's being a replicant is never adequately or consistently developed in either version of the film. paul ryersbach ---- To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]