>Thanks, but maybe I should have been more specific. I've checked out
>Schatz, Solomon, Kaminsky, but I find them all tautological. And Grant
>and Altman and Neale, but they all tend to fall into the same traps.
>Maybe I'm just getting last minute jitters abou this paper on film genre
>theory (and have been readin too much Bordwell).
READING TOO MUCH BORDWELL!?!?!?!
Is that possible?
Also I thought Altman pretty much hit it on the head, but as always this is
open to discussion...
What do you mean that the above authors are too tautological/fall into
traps? I must admit I do not understand....
| Luke T. Delwiche internet: [log in to unmask] |
| fax: (608)264-2200 |