Print

Print


>Thanks, but maybe I should have been more specific.  I've checked out
>Schatz, Solomon, Kaminsky, but I find them all tautological.  And Grant
>and Altman and Neale, but they all tend to fall into the same traps.
>Maybe I'm just getting last minute jitters abou this paper on film genre
>theory (and have been readin too much Bordwell).
>
>arthur
 
READING TOO MUCH BORDWELL!?!?!?!
 
Is that possible?
 
Also I thought Altman pretty much hit it on the head, but as always this is
open to discussion...
 
What do you mean that the above authors are too tautological/fall into
traps?  I must admit I do not understand....
 
LUKE
 
 __________________________________________________________________________
|                                                                          |
|   Luke T. Delwiche              internet:  [log in to unmask]    |
|                                 fax:       (608)264-2200                 |
|__________________________________________________________________________|