SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Corey Creekmur <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Mar 1995 15:25:14 CST
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
        Frankly, this is one of those questions that suggests very little
searching on the part of the questioner, but ... Bruce Conner is one of the
most commonly discussed avant-garde filmmakers, so there's plenty
available: I'd start with Scott MacDonald's interview in A Critical Cinema
(full filmography and many references too), but there are good discussions
in almost any study of American experimental cinema -- Sitney, David James,
etc.  A good essay on Conner appeared in Film Quarterly 31:4 (Summer 1978),
and another in Wide Angle 8:3/4 (by James Peterson).  But again, there's
plenty available -- these are just some of the easy to find sources.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2