SCREEN-L Archives

August 2000, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Scott Andrew Hutchins <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 12:59:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
>
>
> I wonder how many of the Andre Bazins and Robin Woods of this world have
> based their pontifications on viewings of bleached and faded prints without
> realising that the experience could be affecting their reaction to  the film?
>

I think this has a lot to do with people's appreciation of a film.  Many people
who have only seen _Night of the Living Dead_ in a porr quality copy think the
film is "so bad it's good," while those who have only seen Elite's pristine print
find it hard to imagine how they could see it that way.  I certainly do not want
to bring up a debate about that film, but I use it to demonstrate how even
average filmgoers have their perceptions of films altered by such things.

Scott

----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2