SCREEN-L Archives

October 1996, Week 4


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Cynthia Bussiere <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 25 Oct 1996 01:39:20 -0400
text/plain (33 lines)
Dear List,
Hi, everybody.  I'm a new subscriber who has been lurking for about a week.
 I guess I'm what the List "Welcome" document describes as a knowledgeable
layperson.  I'm a legal writer and editor.  I'm also a past member of
Northern California Women in Film & Television.
On the "Peeping Tom"/"Psycho" issue, I think one of the salient points is
that "Peeping Tom" was so different from Powell's previous films, while
"Psycho" remained right in keeping with Hitchcock's suspense genre.  I think
the audiences who adored "Colonel Blimp," "The Red Shoes," and "A Matter of
Life and Death" just refused to accept "Peeping Tom."  My mother is of the
generation who saw Powell's films in their first theatrical runs.  She loved,
and still loves, his films.  But she never could bring herself even to see
"Peeping Tom" (despite my raves).
That said, I'm not wholly satisfied with this explanation myself.  I think
it's only a piece of the puzzle.  I'd be interested to hear what other folks
have to say.
Cynthia Bussiere
[log in to unmask]
San Francisco, California
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]