SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 9 Mar 1995 15:14:19 CST
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Your views on Cape Fear certainly show a deep knowledge and thoughtful
consideration of some of the film's major themes. I wonder if you feel, as I
do, that the central perfromance (De Niro's) is less effective and chilling
than Mitchum's original. The reason for this central failure I believe lies
in the fact the De Niro is playing the force of revenge itself, and Mitchum a
man seeking revenge. The distinction is important. As any student of
Strasberg or Stanislavsky is aware, playing a force is a near impossibility.
De Niro is certainly aware of this. Yet, I think he And De Niro, having
succeeded with the nearly impossible before, were game to try it again. This
time I feel they failed. I'd be curious about your comments. Richard
Brestoff.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2