SCREEN-L Archives

October 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 19 Oct 1994 10:28:24 -0400
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
On Tue, 18 Oct 1994, Lorene Dur wrote:
 
> Rand, pacing in a film has a lot to do with the editing, i.e. length of
> shots, juxtaposition, etc.  I would recommend books like, When The
> Shooting Stops and to check out the theories of Sergei Eisenstein and Leo
> Kuleshov.
>
> ld
>
I definitely agree, pacing can be a very valid and applicable term.
And Stone would be your modern-day montage boy--pacing is everything for him.
 
Ian.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2