SCREEN-L Archives

August 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Drew Halevy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Aug 1994 17:01:37 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
not to start a debate, but i had the exact oppsite reaction. i thought
that Wyatt Earp was simply horrible. I kept waiting for someone to shoot
Kevin Costner for such bad acting. the only good acting in the film was
Dennis Quaid. WE reminded me Geranimo, which carried the revisionist
history theme too far. I simply did not enjoy G or WE. I felt the acting
in WE was simply horrible. WE was about 2.5 hours too long. Tombstone was
no barn burner, but at least it was entertaining.-Drew
 
Drew Halevy
Department of History
University of Arkansas
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2