SCREEN-L Archives

July 1997, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bryan Slagle <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Jul 1997 02:27:19 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
At 06:57 PM 7/26/97 GMT, you wrote:
>I've been told that many PAL to NTSC transfers lose three to four
>minutes for a feature film because they're not done properly.  The
>reason given was that PAL runs at 25 fps and NTSC at 24 but that the
>extra frame isn't dropped each second.  Now unless i'm misunderstanding
 
WHAT??? Not on the conversion equiptment I run! It merely uses FSS (Frame
Store Sync.) to convert the signal between the two... The /scan_rate/ is
digitally re-constructed by digitally manipulating and re-formatting the PAL
signal from a PAL machine, thru the converter to an NTSC, etc. The only loss
is picture quality...
==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==-==
http://transporter.com/bryan/
                                              ________________
                                              \Cheap/ \Shades/
                                               \___/   \____/
 
----
Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the 
University of Alabama.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2