SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Leroy, Marc" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Mar 1995 15:02:23 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
Funny thing is, Tarantino has more classical structure to his screenplays
than most writers.  He just disguises his plot points by switching the
chronology of the story.  In fact, the real plot of PF, the story of Jules
redemption, is very linear and follows those plot points exactly.  The same
sort of thing goes for Reservoir Dogs, where we think it's about figuring
out who the cop is, but it's really about the cop's predicament..  My point:
 the best structure these days is that which seems to be without structure.
 
Marc Leroy
[log in to unmask]
 
 ----------
From: owner-screen-l
To: Multiple recipients of list SCREEN-L
Subject: Re: Jackson, Tarantino & genre decline
Date: Saturday, March 18, 1995 10:45AM
 
 ----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
IMHO, the one great thing about Tarantino is he puts the lie to all of those
screenwriting seminars that teach impressionable noodleheads about hitting
plot points.
 
Arn McConnell
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2