SCREEN-L Archives

November 1997, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ulf Dalquist <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:18:11 +0100
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Viet Nguyen wrote:
 
>That would be like calling Robocop an
>anticorporate, anticapitalist film simply because it has some fun with
>corporate excess while it makes a hundred million dollars.
>
I have difficulties following this argument. Do you actually mean that the
fact that ROBOCOP was an economic success alters the ideological content of
the film. Would it have been considered an "anticorporate, anticapitalist
film" if it failed at the box office? In my view, ROBOCOP is by far the
most interesting action film when it comes to the portrayal of the
conseqences of the neo-libertarianism.
 
Ulf
 
Ulf Dalquist                  Phone:  +46 46 2229572
Dept. of Sociology              Fax:    +46 46 2224794
Box 114 221 00 Lund SWEDEN      E-mail: [log in to unmask]
             http://www.soc.lu.se/~socuda/
"Only sick music makes money today." - Friedrich Nietzsche, 1888
 
----
Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
University of Alabama.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2