SCREEN-L Archives

September 2009, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:25:49 -0400
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<p06240814c6dbf016dbff@[192.168.254.2]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
From:
Antje Ascheid <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
There is an article I once read that talked about young Jack  
Nichoslon and others as anti-stars. Bob Sklar assigned it for a class  
I took with him.

Antje
On Sep 20, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Dana Polan wrote:

> I seem to remember an article in the NY Times that talked about how  
> the new crop of stars (I think they cited Elliot Gould and perhaps  
> Dustin Hoffman) didn't look the classic stars of the golden age of  
> Hollywood.  I've tried multiple keywords to try to track this down  
> but no luck.  Does anyone have know the article I'm alluding to and  
> have a reference for it?
>
> ----
> Learn to speak like a film/TV professor! Listen to the ScreenLex
> podcast:
> http://www.screenlex.org



________________________________________________________

Antje Ascheid
Associate Professor of Film Studies
Fine Arts Building
University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602
(706) 542-2759



----
To sign off Screen-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF Screen-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2