SCREEN-L Archives

February 1996, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Sime <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Feb 1996 06:11:10 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I don't suppose you guys (and gals) wanna consider a low-budget,
left-for-dead sleeper hit of about 20 years ago that is SITLL bing played
to packed audiences, all because of the second script developed by & FOR
the AUDIENCE.
 
So, what, if any is the result of the success of Rocky Horror? And why
hasn't anyone been able to do anything else like it since?
 
 
 
-------------------------------------------------
[   Mike Sime      ]It's not the time it takes to
[  Video Schmideo! ]take the takes, it's the time it
[[log in to unmask]]takes BETWEEN the takes, that
[[log in to unmask] ]takes the time to take the takes.
-------------------------------------------------
         http://www.intac.com/~frelancr
-------------------------------------------------
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2