SCREEN-L Archives

February 1999, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Tue, 16 Feb 1999 19:46:43 +1300
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BE59E5.6176A1A0"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (822 bytes) , application/ms-tnef (3309 bytes)
Whilst living in France I recall the remarks of Toscan du Plantier who was and probably still is someone of note within French film production. He had been at an Academy Award evening where Cyrano de Bergerac, dir. Jean-Paul Rappenau, 1990 was in competion for best foreign language film. the French didn't get it despite believing their film to be a winner. Du Plantier came back from this award ceremony, it wasn't his first, with a more jaundiced view of the award process. I can't recall what he said precisely, but it went something along the lines of: they, the Academy, give the award not to the best foreign film, because that might 'show up' Hollywood, rather, they give it to the most deserving of praise/encouragement, the not-quite-up-to-our-standards-but meretorious-nonetheless.

Regards,
Simon Sigley



ATOM RSS1 RSS2