SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Donald Larsson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 1995 20:26:15 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
Mikel Koven writes:
"One of my pet theories, as a big dePalma fan, is that he has studies
Hitchcock so closely that he can reproduce the Maestros scenes shot by
shot.  It is only Film Academics who see Hitch as a master and dePalma as
a hack."
 
???
I'm quite willing to listen to arguments defending dePalma's artistry, but
how does his ability to "reproduce . . . scenes shot by shot" contribute
to that?  I don't want to fetishize originality-for-its-own-sake, but
what then distinguishes Brian?
 
--Don Larsson, Mankato State U., MN

ATOM RSS1 RSS2