Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 1993 08:49:00 EST |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
E L E C T R O N I C M E S S A G E
Date: 06-Oct-1993 08:40am EDT
From: Stephen Hart
HARTS2
Level: Post-secondary/University
Tel No: 904-644-4839
TO: Remote Addressee ( _jnet%screen-l@ua1vm )
Subject: re: SeaQuest
What Michael said in his post of SeaQuest ("... all that money heading down
the drain") reminded me of ABC's big budget flop _Battlestar Galactica_.
They reportedly spent big bucks on the series, resulting in some okay FX,
but the story lines were standard and run-of-the-mill. That was okay for
me in 1978, when I was still overwhelmed by _Star Wars_, but not later on
when my tastes for good stories developed! I hope too that _SeaQuest_
develops into a better series than it is now, just because I want Steven
Speilberg to have a success with TV. To me, _Star Trek TNG and DS9_ had
pretty weak premieres, but developed into good series by the end of the
first season. Does anyone konw if _SeaQuest_ has managed to hold on to its
67 million viewers it had since the premiere?
Stephen Hart, Florida State University (5-0, 4 days to Armageddon!)
HARTS2@firnvx
|
|
|