SCREEN-L Archives

November 1994, Week 5

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Nov 1994 10:25:47 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Denis Hennelly wrote (some time ago)"
"And I also found the soundtrack very distracting.  Loud, dramatic swellings
of music at every turn.  Along with talking in films (which I would
list as one of the most greivous faults of the cinematic world, expel
these traitors forever from public theaters!) I have found soundtracks
of late to be more and more self-aggrandizing without reason... anyone
else notice this trend towards the grand and operatic throughout entire films?"
 
It's not necessarily *that* new a trend (remember the "Tara" theme?) but I
agree that it is annoying when the music is expected to signal the emotional
weight of a scene.  In IT COULD HAPPEN TO YOU, an otherwise enjoyable and
lowkey romantic comedy, the scene where Bridget Fonda agrees to share the
lottery winnings with Nick Cage is highlighted by a circling camera and
a *big* thumping score, both of which were totally unnecessary--it made
me think more of AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN than the kind of Capraesque
tone that the film seemed to be trying to evoke.
 
--Don Larsson, Mankato State U., MN

ATOM RSS1 RSS2