SCREEN-L Archives

March 1994

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Jonathan Levin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Mar 1994 13:22:37 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
I was pleased to see the New Yorker *do* a film issue, but my admiration
for some of the more inspired pieces (Calvin Trillin, Bill Griffith) was
offset by some alarm at the absence of Terry Rafferty: what's the deal?
 A film issue and the principal film writer isn't involved? I find his
reviews especially engaging and smart.  It would seem that he's being
boxed out by Anthony Lane, who strikes me as MUCH stuffier, not half as
sharp or funny as Rafferty.  Does anyone know what Tina Brown's editorial
politics are re: film?  Where's Michael Sragow?  Has he been relegated to
the *Movies in Brief* section? And what's up with Terrence Rafferty?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2