SCREEN-L Archives

November 1996, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
HR Greenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Nov 1996 17:15:54 -0500
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Im coming in late on this thread, but it seems to me that the answer resides
somewhere beyond ideology (altho I don't dispute this dimension) but in the
realm of cognition, regarding the peculiar power of images in general over
words, and in this regard as implicitly veridical over words, notably over
words heard, as in voiceover narration. Ironically, when words are presented
within the film text itself, as in a letter/proclamation/legal document so
forth they are accorded the same veracity, subject to the same "truth effect"
as other images. I ramble and must think more on't.
 
HR GREENBERG MD     endit.
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2