LISTSERV - LISTSERV.UA.EDU
SCREEN-L
Film and TV Studies Discussion List
Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
SCREEN-L Home SCREEN-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Re: WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE

Matthew Mah <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 11 Sep 1995 10:27:45 -0500
text/plain (22 lines)
Show Text Part by Default | Print
 > The camera cannot be non-biased, because it's operated by a human
 > being.
 > Not only does this create bias, but the cenamatographer is directed
 > to
 > shoot in a biased way.  Throw in the lighting persons ability to
 > subtly
 > influence the way a sceen/actor comes across, and you've got a very
 > biased, if not schizophrenic, "narrator", don't you?
 
That's a very good point, and I agree with you up to a point, but we have to
remember that cinematography (i.e. film stock, lighting, etc.) is just he
aesthetic feel of a film.  Get right down to it, a film in it's barebones is
just dialogue with movement.  Look at that, and then we can make proper
judgements on whether or not it is biased.
 
Matthew
<[log in to unmask]>
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]
Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Header 1

Link 1
Link 2
Link 3