SCREEN-L Archives

September 2004, Week 4

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Scott Hutchins <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:00:46 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
While we're discussing inferior DVD presentations, I thought I'd bring up my Amazon list of DVDs where the film isn't even presented ACCEPTABLY.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/guides/guide-display/-/31AKAC2R9OM9M/ref=cm_bg_guides/102-5168485-9998537

This includes pan and scan discs (not counting "full screen editions" of films that have widescreen editions), improperly matted discs, and discs that squeeze if you don't have a 16x9 TV.  If anyone knows of any more, I'll cetrainly add them.  I was supremely disappointed to find a Godard film released like this.  I returned it without watching it.  I'm glad it was from the library and not a rental.  Some companies hire people who can't competently author discs, which is even worse than catering to the lowest common denominator who thinks letterboxing is cropping.

Scott




________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at cix.csi.cuny.edu

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2