SCREEN-L Archives

October 1997, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Julie Friedline <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Oct 1997 15:01:52 -0600
In-Reply-To:
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (43 lines)
Verrry insteresting. But why a different performance for syndication?
Reconfiguration for a couple more minutes of commercial time? Syndicators
usually just "lop" & "chop" for that, don't they? Would there
be problems with any of the content?
 
Just curious,
Julie Friedline
Dept. of Communication
University of St. Thomas
St. Paul, MN
 
 
 
On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Bryan R Fruth wrote:
9:16 AM:
 
> Actually, there were three performances.  Aside from the two you mention,
> another was performed and recorded for syndication purposes.  I thought
> that you might like to know that there is yet another text to add to your
> comparative analysis.
>
> Best,
>
> Bryan
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Bryan R. Fruth
> Radio-Television-Film
> University of Texas at Austin
> CMA 6.118
> Austin, TX  78712
> (512)471-6676 (o)
> (512)342-2571 (m)
>
> ----
> Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
> University of Alabama.
>
 
----
Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the 
University of Alabama.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2