Content-type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 1997 15:01:52 -0600 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Verrry insteresting. But why a different performance for syndication?
Reconfiguration for a couple more minutes of commercial time? Syndicators
usually just "lop" & "chop" for that, don't they? Would there
be problems with any of the content?
Just curious,
Julie Friedline
Dept. of Communication
University of St. Thomas
St. Paul, MN
On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Bryan R Fruth wrote:
9:16 AM:
> Actually, there were three performances. Aside from the two you mention,
> another was performed and recorded for syndication purposes. I thought
> that you might like to know that there is yet another text to add to your
> comparative analysis.
>
> Best,
>
> Bryan
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Bryan R. Fruth
> Radio-Television-Film
> University of Texas at Austin
> CMA 6.118
> Austin, TX 78712
> (512)471-6676 (o)
> (512)342-2571 (m)
>
> ----
> Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
> University of Alabama.
>
----
Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
University of Alabama.
|
|
|