SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Paul Ramaeker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Mar 1995 14:44:16 CST
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
freelancer writes:
>Can't something, anything be conceived of as
>art WITHOUT being analyzed to death? Can't something that looks great and
>tells the/a story well just be considered good, and leave it at that?
 
No.
 
>It makes it so much more enjoyable...
 
No it doesn't, it sanctifies it and mystifies it, and means we have no way
of understanding it and how it affects our world.
 
PBR

ATOM RSS1 RSS2