Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jul 1994 11:19:03 -0700 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree, Speed just didn't live up to all its lofty praise--Reeves had
not one articulate line (was he playing at playing Stallone and Arnold?);
J. Daniels looked like a fish out of water in this picture; the actress
behind the wheel deserves a special academy award for single handedly
saving this picture from dulldom; Hopper's character lost all his
credibility when he started dancing around on the subway car--and notice
how he grew less and less articulate as the movie progressed, as if
trying to speak to Reeves on the boys level; what else, oh yea, I liked
the film fine
warren
On Fri, 29 Jul 1994, J Metz wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 1994 12:14:13 EDT Andrew Gordon said:
> >Speed, which is neither jokey, allusive, or tongue in cheek, is
> >a much better movie than True Lies. Andrew Gordon
>
> What? Are you kidding? I just got around to seeing Speed last night,
> after all the incredible things I've heard about. I suppose that if you
> took out the hokey dialog, filled the plot holes with a couple of Mack
> trucks, and gave Keanu Reeves (someone whom I normally like watching)
> a *second* emotion, it would possibly *tie* True Lies.
>
> I'm not saying TL was the *best* movie of the summer, but definitely
> better (at least more comprehensive) than Speed.
>
> J Metz
> Department of Telecommunications
> University of Georgia
> Bitnet Internet
> JMETZ@UGA [log in to unmask] |"I was born at the age of zero
> CMSJMETZ@UGA [log in to unmask] | and have been getting older
> JSCAR@UGA [log in to unmask] | ever since."
>
|
|
|