SCREEN-L Archives

March 2002, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Richard J. Leskosky" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:17:26 -0600
In-Reply-To:
<004501c1cc0c$06ef3b60$4601a8c0@David>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
At 11:27 AM +0100 3/15/02, David Skreiner wrote:
>. The studios have a reputation for wanting quick
>cash, which is created by putting bums on seats in the midwest.
>So if a midwestern lower-middle-class audience doesn't like the
>movie... it's back to the cutting room.


If that's true, then why aren't  all the test screenings done in the
midwest?   In fact, they're done mostly in California.  Before you
start making assertions about Hollywood's response to regional/class
stratification in the USA, you need to do  more research.

--Richard J. Leskosky

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2