Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 Apr 1993 16:43:02 EST |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Thu, 8 Apr 1993 16:19:48 EDT from <BLALPERS@PUCC> |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 8 Apr 1993 16:19:48 EDT Benjamin Leontief Alpers said:
>3) Finally (this may be a minority view) I even appreciate the responses
>to filmographic requests. First, I am often interested in these lists.
>Second, I recognize that, if replies were not posted, EVERYONE would send the
>same list of films to the poor person requesting them.
It's not the public responses to filmographic requests that are objectionable.
Ben is right: others may be interested in a particular category.
What I find objectionable is the way these requests trigger "stream of
consciousness" responses and personal musings that are not appropriate
to a list devoted to the >>study<< of film. Lists like CINEMA-L are
available for folks who want to utter their personal, unsubstantiated,
uncritical, uninteresting opinions. Or they might try the local tavern
or dorm lounge or pizza parlor.
Cal Pryluck, Radio-Television-Film, Temple University, Philadelphia
<[log in to unmask]> <PRYLUCK@TEMPLEVM>
|
|
|