SCREEN-L Archives

July 1992


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Jeremy Butler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 8 Jul 1992 16:44:20 CST
text/plain (23 lines)
>I'm a bit perplexed about the ethical boundaries of circulating rumors
>about anyone's sexual preference in Screen-l. It may be that my
>sensibilities are insufficiently developed to appreciate the social or
>aesthetic value of "outing," but it would seem reasonable to allow
>people...even people who work in film... to lead their private lives
>however they wish, unless there is an overriding reason to do otherwise.
>We can disagree on what would be an "overriding reason", but surely,
>rumor-mongering would hardly qualify.
    Yes, Henry, I agree.  I don't think that SCREEN-L should be used for
    outing anyone.  I discussed the issue, privately, with the person who
    originally posted the message.
    Apparently, in this case the outing was committed by THE ADVOCATE (I
    think, I'm going on memory here) and was reported/discussed in THE
    VOICE.  So, it had gone beyond the stage of rumor-mongering and had
    entered the semi-mainstream press.  (Though it certainly hadn't reached
    Tuscaloosa, where I am.)
    I know that GEnie (a commercial information service) has a
    quasi-official policy against users outing in their postings.  I think
    we'd be wise to follow suit.