SCREEN-L Archives

February 2002, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: film length
From:
Michael Sergi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:50:24 +1100
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
I believe that it is due to the lack of strong producers who have allowed
the director to have final cut of the picture. This has been to the
detriment of many films over the past few years. Most films that I have
seen that are 115 minutes plus, would have been better films if they had
been edited down by 10 or more minutes.
Cheers,
Michael

----
For past messages, visit the Screen-L Archives:
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/screen-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2