Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 8 Sep 1995 14:26:15 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
dsmith wrote:
It might be more edifying to identify those films - if any - that do not
use an _unreliable narrator_, since the concept in this thread has being
stretched to mean any protagonist, p.o.v. or plot device, wily-nily. Surely
the thrust of mainstream academic criticism of the past 30 or so years has
been that all literary and filmic utterances (productions) are
_unreliable_, carrying personal and collective socio-political agendas,
which are frequently hidden or camouflaged, and we must tease them apart
(deconstruct) to discover the _real meaning_ (according to whose agenda, ad
nauseum).
So, what fictional film does not have an unreliable narrator?
Isn't it obvious? Forrest Gump ! Forrest is reliable in every sense of
the word.
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]
|
|
|