SCREEN-L Archives

December 1994, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Scott R. Furtwengler" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Dec 1994 06:56:30 -0600
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
You hit the proverbial nail on the head, Don.  Pulp Fiction engages the
notion of "meaning" and how we interpret phenomena or events quite
differently.  Take, for example, Jules' and Vincent's opposed
interpretations of the "miracle."  Ultimately, their respective
interpretations of the incident either save or destroy them.  Jules gets
out of the business and (we assume) survives because he doesn't "blow the
shit off."  Vincent, on the other hand, chooses to interpret the act of
poor marksmanship as a freak occurrence.  Had he been as insightful
regarding the miracle as he was about the implied"meaning" of a foot
massage, he may have walked away from the business, too.
 
Scott R. Furtwengler
P.O.B. 725
De Soto, IL 62924
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2