SCREEN-L Archives

November 1999, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Nina G. Bjornsson" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Nov 1999 17:01:42 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Not to mention Robert Mitchum in  "Pursued."
-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Jozajtis <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: Male Sexuality


>At 9:42 am 16/11/99, paul wiener wrote:
>>I don't seew how you can say this. Female sexuality - long before West and
>>Marlene - has always been visible, exploited, enacted and expected in
>>films. It is MALE sexuality that almost never appeared before Brando.
>
>Slightly off the point: Whilst I accept that female sexuality has always
><been visible, exploited, enacted and expected in films> I'm not sure that
>male sexuality was never visible pre-Brando. What about (e.g.) Valentino,
>Gable, Wayne (even), and the wonderful Victor Mature? This is by no means
>my field, but it seems to me that what Brando did was complicate things by
>making visible (and top-box office) a more ambivalent, homo-erotic (even
>sado-masochistic) dimension to male desire. Has there been much work on
>male sexuality in the movies pre WWII?
>Yours aye
>Kris
>
>----
>Screen-L is sponsored by the Telecommunication & Film Dept., the
>University of Alabama: http://www.tcf.ua.edu
>

----
Online resources for film/TV studies may be found at ScreenSite
http://www.tcf.ua.edu/ScreenSite

ATOM RSS1 RSS2