Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 24 Jul 1996 01:56:40 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Recently, I've been watching lots of New Yorker Films videotapes to prepare
> for a course I'm teaching in the fall. I've noticed that many, if not
> most, of such tapes available at my local video store wear a label claiming
> they've been copy protected with the "Macrovision process."
>
> Now, call me a criminal, but today I decided to try to make a copy of one
> of their tapes anyway (Godard's VIVRE SA VIE). Mysteriously, I had
> absolutely no problem.
>
> Can anyone shed light on this? This has really aroused my curiosity as to the
> nature of the relationship between copyguard companies and tape
> distributors. It would seem that the former would have a strong incentive
> to insure that a tape has *actually been encoded with a particular
> protection mechanism* if it wears such a label, wouldn't it? Or, is it more
> likely that the video store itself is attaching the labels for some reason?
> Is this common?
>
> More generally, does anyone know technical details about how these things
> actually work (beyond the obvious, I mean)?
>
> Rich Cante
> Worcester State College
>
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message. Problems? Contact [log in to unmask]
|
|
|