SCREEN-L Archives

March 1996, Week 1

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tony Williams <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Mar 1996 19:51:49 CST
In-Reply-To:
note of 03/04/96 19:13
Comments:
Converted from PROFS to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
Reply-To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
 Surely, there needs to be a distinction between Welles himself and an
actor (Vincent D'Onofrio) playing Welles in an ideological perspective in
a film where very little discrimination is made between a director who
undoubtedly made bad films and one with talent who was ruined by the
system in Hollywood.
  In this sense ED WOOD is an ideal conservative postmodernist film, a
drooling homage by a director who sees little difference between Welles
and Wood - a real questionable equivalence.
   Tony Williams
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2