SCREEN-L Archives

February 1996, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeffrey Apfel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Feb 1996 12:48:53 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
You wrote:
>
 
>. . . it was the ideas i found reprehensible, not the spelling
>
>mike frank
 
I see Mike's point on this. . .I think he was reading the earlier post
with a sensibility perhaps too finely tuned to picking up
deconstructionist jargon and was wondering whether the words he was
encountering were sloppy spelling or, worse, some newly minted
gibberish posing as critical thinking.  I agree Mike might have come
down a bit hard, but his bullsh*t detector is at least in working
order.
 
Jeff Apfel
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2