SCREEN-L Archives

February 1996, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Donald Larsson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Feb 1996 08:47:47 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Gene Stavis comments:
"I would be extremely dubious about "Accuspeed". In general, they have simply
run silent films at the arbitrary so-called "silent speed" of 16 or 18fps.
This in no way correlates with the original speed of the filmmaking as speeds
ran anywhere from 16 to 24fps in the silent era, often varying within a given
film. My experience with "Video Yesteryear" videos is that they run painfully
slowly -- further distancing the silent film from the modern viewer."
 
I have to second the comments about Video Yesteryear.  Though I haven't seen
their release of OCTOBER, their version of Buster Keaton's last independent
film, COLLEGE, is laughable.  The speed has been so overcompensated that when
Buster jumps over a hedge, he looks as though he's floating through air.
 
It's a nice tool to teach students about shooting and projection rates, but
I can't sit through the thing!
 
Don Larsson, Mankato State U (MN)
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2