SCREEN-L Archives

November 1995, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
lang thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Nov 1995 04:03:23 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
"Evolution" may not be quite the right word since it implies (as did
your post) an increasing sophistication.  (I know it doesn't mean that
when used as a biological term but in general use i think it does.)
Certainly silent films are no less artistic or accomplished than
current ones.  Films have become more complex in only the most
superficial aspects:  color, sound, increased ability to manipulate
images, etc.  If there is a gap in the evolution at all it would be
from the earliest films jumping to narrative.  After that, it's only a
matter of what resources are available to the filmmaker and some of the
best work is done with limitations.
 
Best, LT
 
----
To signoff SCREEN-L, e-mail [log in to unmask] and put SIGNOFF SCREEN-L
in the message.  Problems?  Contact [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2