SCREEN-L Archives

April 1995, Week 2

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeremy Butler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Apr 1995 19:13:22 CDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Re:   three, four and five stars
 
      The Michelin guide popularized -- if it did not introduce -- the use
 
      of one, two and three-star designations;  if memory serves, one star
 
      was for a restaruant worth stopping at if you were passing by, two
 
      for a restaruant worth making a side-trip to and three for a
 
      restaurant which was worth making an entire trip.  Four stars is puffery.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2