SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 3

SCREEN-L@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
ROBERT JOHN FERGUSON <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Mar 1995 12:43:30 CST
Reply-To:
ROBERT JOHN FERGUSON <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
 
 
I think that CRACKER has to be judged as a piece of realist drama
in which, unlike the films of Tarantino, the violence hurts.  That
is one explanation, at least, why it ofended some.  In point of
fact, the second series of CRACKER 'showed' a murder scene in
which we saw neither the murder nor the body - but the response of
those characters who did generated more anxiety in the face of
violence than all the brains scattered over all the cars seats
.......
 
 
 
>----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>When I was in Britain in the fall,, CRACKER was shown as a weekly series
>in the U.K. The program was quite popular, although there was some
>serious criticism directed against what some thought to be gratuitous violence.
>
>-Henry Breitrose
> Stanford
>
 
Robert Ferguson

ATOM RSS1 RSS2