SCREEN-L Archives

March 1995, Week 1


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Karen Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Sat, 4 Mar 1995 07:59:09 CST
text/plain (57 lines)
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Edwin, --
   It will be wonderful some day to scan articles of interest to our groups
and send them over the Net, but until Copyright laws provide for such a
great service,the bibliographic citation will have to do. I'm appreciative
of those (such as below) that are noted.
Karen Robinson, Librarian
Communication & the Arts
Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA
P.S. This is my first attempt to send a message as I am a new subscriber.
'Hope it works. :-)
>----------------------------Original message----------------------------
>Earlier today I posted to this group, Re:John Williams,Bruce Springsteen,
>Neil Young, Michael Nyman
>>As I was catching up on the Sunday New York Times --merely 30 January 1994
>>(that's right, 94 NOT 95),in the Arts etc section, page 28, I found an
>>interesting, brief article about the above people --by Stephen Holden who
>>is also a film critic for the NYT.
>>You may wish to check it out.
>Here is my own follow-up:
>Having reached the Arts & Leisure Section of the Sunday NYTimes of April
>24, 1994 (yes, 1994), on p. 22 I found an article by Ann Hornaday on the
>documentary "High Lonesome: The Story of Bluegrass Music" written &
>directed by Rachel Liebling.
>I believe that it is in this group that questions have popped up re: this
>This brings me to something crucial. When and how will we be able to post
>not simply our own messages and elucubrations, but *printed items" of
>(possible) interest to a few or to many peope or groups. Until then, the
>Net, amazing though it is,  will still be lame.
>One answer, I suppose, is to scan the article and then send it. But this
>seems to involve expensive equipment, bulky machines, and a fairly long
>process. It is also (I am told) not that quick and easy to scan a newspaper
>page. Hand scanners might be simpler, but then, according to my
>betters--though not necessarily elders-- those gizmos don't work well.
>I wonder what the whiz-kids (and adults) among us have to say to all this.
>And since this might be of interest to persons in a plethora of groups, no
>matter what their specialty, I will post this message to more than one
>Edwin Jahiel, Cinema Studies, University of Illinois
>" Le mauvais gout mene au crime" (Stendhal)