On Sun, 10 Apr 1994 13:21:18 EDT Robert Withers said:
>On Sun, 10 Apr 1994 11:47:42 CDT Jeremy Butler said:
>>Thus, you would have the option of (1) receiving each SCREEN-L message
>>via e-mail (as the system works right now) or (2) browsing through SCREEN-L
>>messages (and optionally posting replies) on Usenet.
> Jeremy, if you don't mind clarifying your clarification, does the above
>mean that the usenet conference would be a kind of "read-only" spinoff of
>Screen-L, and that usenet readers could post to the usenet conference, but
>these posts would not be forwarded to the Screen-L list via e-mail?
Yeah, Robert, it could be done this way. The SCREEN-L-Usenet gateway could
be made "uni-directional": SCREEN-L to Usenet, but not Usenet to SCREEN-L.
Or, it could be bi-directional: SCREEN-L to Usenet *and* Usenet to
It's our choice...if we choose to make the connection at all.
> Actually, don't many more people have access to e-mail, and therefore to
>listserv lists, than to usenet?
Yes, that's my impression. And I myself only recently found a way into
Usenet that wasn't so cumbersome as to make it use*less*.
Let me stress once again: even if we do open this gateway, SCREEN-L would
continue to be available through e-mail as it currently is. Indeed, that
would continue to be the *main* was SCREEN-L operates.
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
--Rev. Martin Luther King
Letter from the Birmingham jail
| Jeremy G. Butler - - - - - - - - - - | Internet : [log in to unmask] |
| SCREEN-L Coordinator | BITNET : JBUTLER@UA1VM |
| Telecommunication & Film Dept * The University of Alabama * Tuscaloosa |