Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 1994 23:20:24 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The accusation of plagiarism leveled at Quentin Tarantino completely
overlooks the fact that what makes a film an original piece of work in a
way that should be of interest to us as film scholars is its film specific
characteristics. There are no original stories, only original ways of
expressing them. _Reservoir Dogs'_ brilliance lies not in the story, but
in how it is told. It mobilizes and subverts genre conventions from at
least two distinct cinemas. There is a radical restriction of knowledge
exercised for much of the film. The conventions of commercial narrative
film demand a far more highlighted protagonist than we are given by
_Reservoir Dogs_. This is really extraordinary formal experimentation.
Finally, the film's unrelenting and unapologetic cruelty is quite distinct
from the HK brand of tongue-in-cheek action or expansive male melodrama.
Kelly Wolff <[log in to unmask]>
Department of Communication Arts
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, WI 53706
|
|
|