SCREEN-L Archives

February 1993


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Reply To:
Film and TV Studies Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Tue, 23 Feb 1993 20:39:05 EST
text/plain (25 lines)
Barbara Kopple originally went to Harlan County, Kentucky as a volunteer
organizer for Miners for Democracy (or some such opposition to the
union establishment). She had been an editor and saw the possibilities
of raising the issues in a wider context, but always as an organizing
instrument. Her distribution contract had specific provisions that the
film would be >rent-free< in the Appalachian mining region and to other
union-organizing related showings.
The point to this comment is not to simply correct historical understanding
but to elaborate on the point that I made earlier about collaborating with
the people in the film. HARLAN COUNTY U.S.A. was the product of two
city kid film professionals -- Barbara Kopple and Hart Perry -- and the
people who appeared in the film. Barbara and Hart lived with the people
and took the same chances they did. Kopple tells of carrying a revolver
or being accompanied by a guard when going to use the outside toilet.
Whether any of this did any good for the miners is another question; I'm
increasingly skeptical about the value of a film in changing anything
unless accompanied by political organization. A film might help organize
but people have to do the organizing on the ground -- door-to-door, person-
to-person. No film that I know of has changed anything by itself.
Cal Pryluck, Radio-Television-Film, Temple University, Philadelphia
<[log in to unmask]> <PRYLUCK@TEMPLEVM>